tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3488714185161131282.post3457734988200851540..comments2023-03-25T22:34:20.873-07:00Comments on World History And Anthropology: Black VikingsHernandayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11766776991147601403noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3488714185161131282.post-82176500605013818692014-02-23T02:49:19.734-08:002014-02-23T02:49:19.734-08:00“Untenaavian genome is clustering with africans. “...“Untenaavian genome is clustering with africans. “<br />Non-sense. Black female L in Scandinavia<br />Norway Central Norway 74 Passarino et al. (2002) 1.40%[42]<br /><br />Norway - Rosenberg et al. (2002) 1.00%<br />Norway - Wilson et al. (2001) 1.00%<br /><br />Britain 76 Piercy et al. (1993) 1.00%<br />Finland 50 Sajantila et al. (1995) 2.00%<br />Germany 333 Pliss et al. (2005) 1.20%<br /> <br /><br /><br />>> To add onto that one of the viking major centres, Dublin actually means we're black in the Irish language.<br />Dubh = black<br />Linn= we<br />Dubh+ Linn = We black<<<br /><br />“That is not what it means in Gaelic at all. *Ba Gaelic.”<br /><br />Non sense, go get an irish dictionary and an English one. There is no word called dubh or linn in English but there is in irish.<br /><br />>>Pliny described the Iberians complexion as aethiopium, i.e. black as an Ethiopian. (Ancient and Modern Britons: a retrospect, Vol. 3 by David MacRitchie, London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Co., 1884, pg. 45)<<<br /><br />“I guess Pliny was incorrect then, because it i”<br /><br />Iberians are fully Europeans which is why they were described as black....It doesn’t take more than 1-4 generations to get full white looking people from European admixed peoples. Did you forget about the High African admixture in Portuguese and Spaniard more so the former than the later?<br />“A principal component analysis of data from Human Genome Diversity Project by Reich et al. detected a West-to-East gradient of Bantu related ancestry across Eurasia. The authors suggest that after the Out of Africa migration, there was most likely a later Bantu-related gene flow into Europe”<br />Reich D, Price AL, Patterson N (May 2008). "Principal component analysis of genetic data". Nature Genetics40 (5): 491–2. doi:10.1038/ng0508-491.PMID 18443580.<br /> As for di-pigmented, have you even been to Portugal? Most of them are CAPABLE of tanning dark as black or biracial people.<br />>>That the Silures were black does not need to be questioned. They were described as short in stature, with brown complexions, and black curled hair and dark eyes. In the second century A.D., the Roman historian Pliny described the Britons complexions as “Ethiopian.” (African Presence in Early Europe by Ivan Van Sertima, ed. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2007, pg. 225) In his book, Memoirs of the Celts of Gauls, Joseph Ritson gives this assessment regarding the Silures origins<<<br /><br />“Again, genotypically?”<br /><br />Yes impossible because you said so but people of history said it was true, who are you, why should anyone believe you over esteemed experts?<br /><br />It is well known Queen Victoria grand mother and king George iii wife was a black woman. This makes the Queen of England today making the queen about 6% black or so or 1/16th black, her grand son and future king is about 1% black. Since the whites have always had more children than black Europeans over time the whites breed them out of existence (particularly Germanic and Slavic peoples). This was because by the medieval period the demographics were changing. You went from having a black Europe to a white Europe with a fixed Black elite who painted their skin white in public to avoid being killed as there were a series of race wars that were later disguised by the European whites who took over as religious or tribal interconflict. This is why they were constantly powdering and painting their skin white (a African practice in origin by the way and professor dunn touches on this as well). Many of the elite like Niger val dubh, the black prince, the sun king etc are described as black skinned people. If you want the evidence to that, you’re going to have to wait for the book release.<br /><br />In terms of phenotype it doesn’t take more than 1 or 2 generations of marrying whites for that to go. In terms of genotype it is still there. The mtdna from above shows 1% black british ancestry in whites. The Prince of England today is about 1% black and he has a known and documented black ancestor who survived much later than alot of the other blacks did.Hernandayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11766776991147601403noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3488714185161131282.post-52340863341652758432014-02-22T15:35:07.175-08:002014-02-22T15:35:07.175-08:00>>"The Danes, then, were like the "...>>"The Danes, then, were like the "Moors"—black." Page 121;<<<br /><br />Untenable supposition. There is no hint of African bloodlines that far north. Not even 0.5% of the scandinavian genome is clustering with africans. <br /><br />>> To add onto that one of the viking major centres, Dublin actually means we're black in the Irish language.<br />Dubh = black<br />Linn= we<br />Dubh+ Linn = We black<<<br /><br />That is not what it means in Gaelic at all. *Baile Átha Cliath* is the Gaelic for the city, while the english gave it their own name Dubhlinn meaning *black pool* or *black lake*, which has no connection with the Gaelic.<br /><br />>>Pliny described the Iberians complexion as aethiopium, i.e. black as an Ethiopian. (Ancient and Modern Britons: a retrospect, Vol. 3 by David MacRitchie, London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Co., 1884, pg. 45)<<<br /><br />I guess Pliny was incorrect then, because it is impossible for a population to depigment in just 2k years, and modern Iberians are fully european derived with only slight north african admixture as seen autosomally.<br /><br />>>That the Silures were black does not need to be questioned. They were described as short in stature, with brown complexions, and black curled hair and dark eyes. In the second century A.D., the Roman historian Pliny described the Britons complexions as “Ethiopian.” (African Presence in Early Europe by Ivan Van Sertima, ed. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2007, pg. 225) In his book, Memoirs of the Celts of Gauls, Joseph Ritson gives this assessment regarding the Silures origins<<<br /><br />Again, impossible. But let's assume it is true. Let us then ask "Where did all the black celtic britons and iberians go"? What became of them, both phenotypically and genotypically?<br /><br />Cheers!<br /><br />D.I.Xianshan<br /><br />D.I.Xianshanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05992509078717877264noreply@blogger.com