Ancient Greeks DNA myth rebuttal

Herodotus (circa 440 B.C.)

Book 1 – CLIO

[1.58] The Hellenic race has never, since its first origin, changed its speech. This at least seems evident to me. It was a branch of the Pelasgic, which separated from the main body, and at first was scanty in numbers and of little power; but it gradually spread and increased to a multitude of nations, chiefly by the voluntary entrance into its ranks of numerous tribes of barbarians.

Its obvious the barbarians are refering to the barbarians tribes from central asia also known as the white people or germanics that the Romans would give the same name. But what is important here is that Herodutus makes it clear the original Greeks were a branch of the Pelasgic race of peoples. A black African race of peoples closely associated with the Niger-Congoan speaking mande and mandinka peoples of West Africa who moved into north africa and along with neighbouring black africans like the garamantes and carians moved into Greece to create the greek civilization.

It is generally accepted and was until the age of white scientific racism that the Pelasgic people were a black or Hamitic race or peoples (descendants of Ham the biblical father of the black race essentially another term for black people used largely in the 18th and 19th century)

"Italy- HamiUc Pelasgians in the south"

"Sicily HamiUc Iberian Sieanes, 2000 b. c. ; 
Hamitic Pelasgians"


"Greece- Hamitic Pelasgians, 2500 B.C.
Hamitic; Shepherds " and Phoenicians, 1700 to 

1200 b. c. "
OUR REMOTE ANCESTRY. 249 

"craniography they supplied the mesocephalic element. We thus 
get a conception of a vast Hamitic empire existing in prehis- 
toric, Neolithic times, whose several nationalities were centered 
in Mesopotamia, Canaan, Egypt, north-western Africa, Iberia, 
Greece, Italy, Sicily, Sardinia, and central Europe — an intelli- 
gent and powerful ethnic family, the first of the Adamites to 
emerge into historic light, but with the record of its achieve- 
■ ments buried in a gloom almost as dense as that which covers 
the ruder population that the Hamites everywhere displaced. 
To this family, chiefly, are to be traced the dark complexions of 
the nations and tribes still dwelling around all the shores of the 
Mediterranean."
OUR REMOTE ANCESTRY. 254


"Indo-Europeans are known to have been in Europe as early 
as 2000 b. c. Before this epoch two empires had been estab- 
lished by other invaders — the Iberian in the south-west, and the 
Pelasgian in the south-east. The Iberians entered by the"

Again it made quiet clear by pre and non-scientific racist published documents 
that the non-european never were in Europe before 2000 b.c. So when you go and 
see
Greece was inhabited from as early as 24,000 B.C. you know the people there were black.

"Pillars of Hercules. They came from Atlantis and northern 
Africa, at the time when the Hamitic Berbers were gaining 
possession. They overran the Spanish peninsula, founded cities, 
built a navy, carried on commerce, extended their empire over 
the countries that later were known as Gaul and Britain, held 
Italy as Sicanes when Rome was founded, long before the sack 
of Troy, and from Italy passed into Sicily as early as 2000 b. c. 
Here they were disturbed by Pelasgians, while along the Med- 
iterranean shore Aryan Ligures penetrated to the Pyrenees and 
beyond."

"By 1000 b. c, the Phoeni- 
cians possessed the greater part of Spain. The Basques are the 
only existing remnant of the Iberian people, and they are ex- 
tensively Gallicized. Their language, says "Whitney, possesses 
some affinities with those of the American family, which is 
ethnically Mongoloid ; but their cranial characters approach the 
type of the Guanches and Berbers, which is Hamitic."


"The Pelasgic Empire was at its meridian as early as 2500 
B. c. This people came from the islands of the AEgean, and more 
remotely from Asia Minor. They were originally a branch of 
the sunburnt Hamitic stock, that laid the basis of civilization 
in Canaan and Mesopotamia, destined later to be Semitized. 
Danaos and his daughters — that is, the fugitive "Shepherds" 
from Egypt — sought refuge among their Hamitic kindred in the 
Peloponnesus about 1700 B. 0. Three hundred years before 
this these Pelasgians had learned the art of weaving and agri- 
culture from Aryan immigrants. In time they occupied the 
whole of Greece and Thessaly. Before 2000 B. c, they estab- 
lished themselves in Italy, and, after reverses and Aryan subju- 
gation, founded a later empire — 992 to 974 B. c. — known as 
Etruscan, which extended north beyond the Po. Rome itself 
was Pelasgian from the fourteenth century to 428 B. c. But in 
Italy and in Greece the Hamitic stock was displaced and ab- 
sorbed by Aryan, as in Asia it had been by Semitic. "

OUR REMOTE ANCESTRY. 247 


So there you have it, given this book was written by a white man and published inthe most leading literary magazine available at his time


The North American Review Volume 0139 Issue 334 (Sept 1884)
Title: Our Remote Ancestry [pp. 246-256]
Author: Winchell, Alexander, Prof.
Collection: Journals: North American Review (1815 - 1900)






ANCIENT TYPES OF MAN
BY ARTHUR KEITH (1911)
CHAPTER VI, THE GRIMALDI OR NEGROID TYPE IN EUROPE, PAGE 59-63:


At the close of the last and at the beginning of the present century, largely owing to the interest taken in the history of primitive man by the Prince of Monaco, systematic excavations were carried out in deep strata of their floors. In one of these, the "Grotte des Enfants," usually named the Grimaldi Cave In the lowest layer of all were found two skeletons—one of a woman past middle life, with a stature estimated (5 ft. 2 in.) and the other of a boy about sixteen to seventeen years of age, and about (5 ft. 1 in.) in height. With them were found traces of a civilization and of a fauna which has led anthropologists to assign them to the end of the Mousterien or beginning of the Aurignacien Period [40,000 to 28,000 years ago]. French anthopologist Dr. Verneau, who has published the results of a minute examination of these two ancient individuals, from various features seen in the skeletons, had no hesitation in assigning them to a Negroid race.








MAN'S PLACE IN NATURE AND OTHER ANTHROPOLOGICAL ESSAYS 
BY THOMAS H. HUXLEY (1899)
HUMAN FOSSILS


I shall confine myself, in discussing this question, to those fragmentary Human skulls from the caves of Engis in the valley of the Meuse, in Belgium, which have been examined with so much care by Sir Charles Lyell; upon whose high authority I shall take it for granted, that the Engis skull belonged to a contemporary of the Mammoth and of the woolly Rhinoceros. The skull from the cave of Engis was originally discovered by Professor Schmerling, and was described by him, together with other human remains disinterred at the same time, in his valuable work, " Recherches sur les Ossemens fossiles decouverts dans les Cavernes de la Province de Liege, published in 1833 (p. 59, et seq.), from which the following paragraphs are extracted, the precise expressions of the author being, as far as possible, preserved. 

In order to neglect no point respecting the form of this fossil skull, we may observe that, from the first, the elongated and narrow form of the forehead attracted our attention. In fact, the slight elevation of the frontal, its narrowness, and the form of the orbit, approximate it more nearly to the cranium of an Ethiopian than to that of a European.





CIVILIZATION OR BARBARISM: AN AUTHENTIC ANTHROPOLOGY
BY CHEIKH ANTA DIOP (1981): PP. 15-16

The Grimaldi Negroids have left their numerous traces all over Europe and Asia, from the Iberian Peninsula to Lake Baykal in Siberia, passing through France, Austria, the Crimea, and the Basin of Don, etc. In these last two regions, the late Soviet Professor Mikhail Gerasimov, a scholar of rare objectivity, identified the Negroid type from skulls found in the Middle Mousterian period.



What is of note is that since the eurocentricks people have both simultaneously 
tried to claim that they come from central asia and that they are indigenous peoples of europe they have caught themself in a big old lie and erased their true central asian history.

First they claim that black people moved from tropical africa into the desert of the middle east (which are hotter than tropical africa) and then became white skinned and moved into Europe.  This claim is ridiculous on several levels, but mainly we should not be finding all these negroid types in ancient Europe like la brana man, who is a black skin blue eyed african man found in spain dating back to 7000 years ago




In fact most scientist have long ago dropped the claim for the reason that virtually all of the northern and far southern near artic or sub artic and ant artic peoples are dark skinned except for germanic immigrants who populate northern Europe of today.

So this leaves the eurocentricks engaging in mental gymnastics, the evidence is all showing ancient europe being originally inhabited by a black hamitic negroid or africoid peoples like the boy above. But if they admit it, it is admitting that their predecessors lied and erased the whites true central asian history and that their current history is a stolen false one stolen from black europeans. 
For instance, no one knows why the Huns pushed the germanics and slavs out of Asia and worked so hard to eliminate them or what it was the white central asians did to the east asian han type peoples to cause this.

So then who are white people. Albinoid Dravidian Indians. Indians in the broadest sense of the word including Pakistanis, Afghanis and so on.





Note the dark skin mother and father with all white skinned blue eyed blond and ginger children. This is a mutuation in the P gene it was these people who interbred and moved from Northern Afghanistan and Pakistan into Kazakstan. Eventually chased off for reasons the eurocentricks will not release and may have destroyed. 
Given that the germanics and slavics and dorians and italics never invented 
writing the real white history of whites in central asia has essentially been 
lost.